9/11 Truth Avalanche Gaining Momentum

9/11 Truth Avalanche of Information Gaining Momentum

[Note: This article first appeared at a discussion group called Collander. I was sent this by a friend via email. Attribution follows.]

Posted by: "wdestiny44@aol.com" wdestiny44@aol.com coronaborealis444
Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:08 pm (PST)

It’s an avalanche that only continues to grow...How much more “proof” do the skeptics need? Are all these experts wrong? Yes, denial is a terrible thing. I invite you to visit Professors Question 9/11 for more statements

Scientists Debunk Official 9/11 Theories

Numerous credible scientists have recently disproven some of the most commonly-held, but false, theories about the collapse of the World Trade Centers on September 11, 2001:

A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects, stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition

A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition

A professor emeritus of physics and former division chairman from a small community college said "My wife and I, transfixed in front of a TV as the horror of 9/11 unfolded, watched as the topmost, undamaged floors of the WTC South Tower started to gradually lean (rotate) in the direction of the damage due to impact. In an instant, the rotation stopped, and that which was rotating began to fall, as if only under the influence of gravity! The fulcrum was no longer there! I blurted out, My god, they wired the building.

An expert on controlled demolition said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (and see TV interview here ; both in Danish)

An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use, has disputed the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition

A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded that the Twin Towers were brought down by planted explosives.

A professor of mathematics said The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized

Two structural engineers at a prestigious Swiss university said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition Translation here

A Dutch demolition expert stated that WTC 7 was imploded

A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority stated regarding WTC 7 that The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition.

A Danish professor of chemistry said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this (translated)

See this scientific journal and this web page (skip to "Mathematics,
Science and Engineering") for additional scientists who question 9/11.


Snail Mail
Citizen Ray
c/o R. Duray
98 NW Riverside Blvd. #1
Bend, OR 97701

User login